{"id":535,"date":"2019-12-07T17:55:11","date_gmt":"2019-12-07T17:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/?p=535"},"modified":"2019-12-07T18:03:29","modified_gmt":"2019-12-07T18:03:29","slug":"ai-revolution-or-evolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/2019\/12\/07\/ai-revolution-or-evolution\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Revolution or Evolution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An interesting <em><a href=\"https:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/computing\/software\/ai-and-economic-productivity-expect-evolution-not-revolution\">IEEE Spectrum article<\/a><\/em> \u201cAI and Economic Productivity: Expect Evolution, Not Revolution\u201d by Jeffrey Funk questions popular claims about the rapid pace of AI\u2019s impact on productivity and the economy. He asserts that \u201cDespite the hype, artificial intelligence will take years to significantly boost economic productivity\u201d. If correct, this will have serious implications for public policymaking who have chosen due be proactive. The article raises good points, but many of the examples do not look like real AI, at least as a dominant component. Putting \u201csmart\u201d in the name of a product doesn\u2019t make it AI, and automation doesn\u2019t necessarily use AI.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On a broader note, we should care about the technology language we use and be aware of the usual practices in commercialization.&nbsp;As discussed in previous blog posts, expanding too far the meanings of terms like AI, machine learning, and algorithms makes rational discourse more difficult. Some of us remember marketing of expert systems and relational databases: companies do a disservice to society by claiming each breakthrough technology actually is in their products. Here we go again \u2014 today about anything counts as AI depending on the point you want to make and the products you want to sell.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another issue raised by the article is from the emphasis on startups as the leaders of economic impact, as opposed to the results of innovations from established industry and government labs. Technologies have adoption curves, going from early adopters through the laggards, of about seven years. If you add to that the difficulties of making a startup succeed, a decade or so is probably the minimum timescale for large impact on the economy. A better perspective on revolution versus evolution could come from longitudinal evaluations looking at trends. In that case, a good endpoint for a hypothesis about dramatic impact on productivity might be the 2030-2035 timeframe.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A problem with using a vague or broad notion of AI is that policymakers could miss the revolutionary impact of data science, which can, but may not, involve real AI. Data science probably has the best chance of dramatically impacting society and the economy in the short and long terms and has the advantage of not having to involve designing and manufacturing physical objects, and thus not always having to wait for consumers to adopt new products.\u00a0Data Science is already affecting society and employment with obvious, and not so obvious, revolutionary impacts on our lives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An interesting IEEE Spectrum article \u201cAI and Economic Productivity: Expect Evolution, Not Revolution\u201d by Jeffrey Funk questions popular claims about the rapid pace of AI\u2019s impact on productivity and the economy. He asserts that \u201cDespite the hype, artificial intelligence will take years to significantly boost economic productivity\u201d. If correct, this will have serious implications for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/2019\/12\/07\/ai-revolution-or-evolution\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;AI Revolution or Evolution&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=535"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":539,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535\/revisions\/539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sigai.acm.org\/aimatters\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}